A Golden Age for Dance Music

Think back to early 2008. A little-known singer named Lady Gaga had just appeared on American Idol to enthusiastic crowds who praised her strange costumes and innovative blend of electro and hip-hop/pop. Dance music was still largely relegated to those within the "scene," with innovators like Oakenfold, Tiesto, and even Justin Timberlake who laid the groundwork with blending more progressive pop influences into their songs. But then again, dance music was still largely unnoticed with the one notable exception being Cascada, who by some unknown miracle had managed to crack the Hot 100 with an upbeat eurodance song in 2006. David Guetta (and others) were making masterful dance albums, none of which charted on the Top 200 and dance radio airplay was doing about the same as it had been doing in 2002.

Everything has changed. When you see that Rihanna won a Grammy for Best Dance Recording and Usher and Ne-Yo come out with songs that sounds like Ferry Corsten mixed them in 2002, you know that Toto is dancing somewhere at a techno club in Kansas.

The reason? Gaga. As much as I criticize her for being unoriginal, annoying, and outlandish, no one can deny her immense contribution to the genre, so much so that I'd put the 21st century timeline of dance music into two quadrants: Pre-Gaga and Post-Gaga. Her innovative genre-blending of electro, pop, hip-hop, and house (that still hasn't gotten a proper label) made it COOL for artists to borrow things like dance beats, synth pianos, and progressive chord structures. And above all-- put attitude back into pop music. She hasn't been doing anything that say, Kylie Minogue didn't do in 2004...but she does it a whole lot better, and with controversy galore. Now that Gaga-sound has caught on to every aspect of Pop music, pop and R&B performers turn to dance music with open earbuds and even make some of the more hardcore elements of hip-hop don sequins and glowsticks.

Let's look at this dramatic transformation on a timeline to better illustrate what I'm saying: Pre-Gaga we had Cascada and SexyBack by Justin Timberlake, as well as a whole hoard of Pop Remixes that had some airplay in clubs (Deborah Cox, Madonna, Britney, etc.). Post-Gaga....Well, let's just take a look at the Hot 100! Usher - DJ Got Us Falling In Love, Ne-Yo - Beautiful Monster, Rihanna - Only Girl In The World, Pitbull- Calle Ocho, Britney Spears - Hold It Against Me, Katy Perry - California Grrls, Black Eyed Peas - Time Of My Life (Dirty Bit), Enrique Iglesias - Tonight (I'm Loving You) and the list keeps on going!

If it's dance music, it's hot right now. Electronic music is not only replacing organic music, but also in some way, the more electronic the better. My question is, what does this mean for the genre? Well, folks, I think we're entering another Golden Age for Dance Music.

What's really great about this electronic pop trend is that existing dance/electronica performers have had a Frankensteinian resurrection with the growing pop fascination with dance music. To some extent, yes, it's because of their own shift towards more commercially accessible music. Of course, there have been mixed results (I'll be the first to admit Tiesto's "Pop" album wasn't so great). But for the handful of crossover acts that have really taken off, the impact has been HUGE. And let's give a lot of credit to French DJ David Guetta for pioneering the movement. After somehow convincing wil.i.am.that dance music was awesome, David Guetta has become one of the top-selling music acts in the U.S., and conventional house performers like Daft Punk and Deadmau5 and electro artists like Robyn have cracked the Hot 100 and Top 200 for the first time in YEARS.

One only wonders how long this Golden Age will last. Even fleeting revivals of dance music like in the age of Technotronic, Ace of Base, and La Bouche in the early 1990's, are ephemeral at best. I gotta hand it to Gaga... She's got a good thing going on, and inevitably, there might be a cult of personality factor with how long this lasts. But (and this is a rare thing when I say this), here's to Gaga to see if she can keep it up so dance music can continue to flourish.

Love Letter - R. Kelly (2010)

Sigh...This album can be summed up with the phrase "R. Kelly will be R. Kelly," or maybe more aptly-titled, "You can't teach an old dog new tricks or how not to pee on little girls."

I had been hyping up Love Letter for about a month from the strength of the incredible lead single "When A Woman Loves," a classic soul throwback which could have easily been something Al Green or even Marvin Gaye could have done if they were still relevant/alive. Music critics, including myself, had seen the album as a way for R. Kelly to redeem himself from the auto-tuned steaming pile of "Untitled" that he released in 2009 and pave the way for him to revive his career with classic soul.

How wonderful that would have been if that was actually the case. Fact: if your best song on the album is a re-release of a song you wrote for Michael Jackson, we've got a serious problem. Yes, the ballad "You Are Not Alone" that R. Kelly wrote for MJ has finally been recorded by the original artist. And, let's face it, the song always fit R. Kelly's voice and style way better than MJ's. But that's pretty much the highlight of the album, minus the aforementioned "When A Woman Loves." The rest of the album, R. Kelly flirts with elements of classic soul, but suddenly relapses into his all-too-familiar rut of braggadocio and seduction songs with abysmal lyrics. Lows of the album include boring follow-up single "Love Letter" and the laughably dirty Taxi Cab. When will R. Kelly learn that we just want him to romance us and not weird us out? Perhaps the worst offense is the idiotic "Christmas Remix" of Love Letter which might have been remotely amusing, if not for Kelly's tired insistence on using the same instruments (that BLOODY flute!!) that he was obsessed with back on Chocolate Factory and pretending that "stepping" is a really cool new concept that he just invented. Please.

My Ranking: This album is deceptive. It's R. Kelly wanting you to believe he's turned soul, but it's really the same-old mediocre R. Kelly. He needs to take a dip back into the Chocolate Factory days to cook up some better-written songs.

Music Review: SWRMXS - HIM (2010)

HIM is a much-maligned band. It's kind of like the kid who you knew in high school who wore suspenders and just tried way too hard to be cool, but you still kind of liked him anyway for trying. HIM is a joke within the metal community, their self-declared genre of "Love Metal," being neither loving nor metal. Most consider it more of an overindulgent alternative rock band with a great lead singer (Ville Valo has chops that even rival Chris Cornell).

It's easy to hate on HIM with this album saying "They're a metal band who did a techno remix album? Better call Macy's cause I smell a sellout" But if you look at SWRMXS as a companion album to the incredibly mediocre Screamworks: Love In Theory And In Practice (2010), things aren't so cut and dry.

Screamworks was plauged by shitty songwriting, and maybe that's why the remix album sounds nothing like it. This isn't the band's first foray into the remix world, though their 2007 attempt Uneasy Listening was a barely-remixed cash cow attempt. SWRMXS certainly has the band swimming in unfamiliar waters. Even though Valo has a great voice, most of the remixes are chopped n' screwed or feature heavily distorted samples of the original songs. It actually sounds like someone went into a boardroom and said "Hey we want you to make electronic songs that sound nothing like HIM and then slap our name on it." Only Morgan Page and Tiesto provide anything that conventionally sounds like a dance remix one could play on the radio (both standout tracks).

The rest of the album is pretty clever though. Tracks like “In The Arms Of Rain” (SALEM Remix) made by the extremely talented Drag/Witchhouse group Salem use heavily distorted and choppy samples to create an ethereal atmosphere in an almost trip-hop song with no vocals. The other type of remix would be typified by the “In Venere Veritas” (Huoratron Remix), extremely heavy electro that wouldn't sound out of place in the more underground electronic radio stations in the depths of the internet. But it's all done with HIM samples and conforming to the general song structure of the original, though I can't imagine anyone who isn't intimately familiar with electronic music would notice.

The album has really got to piss off HIM fans. As a remix album, it fails to capture the spirit and flavor of the original band, but I also wouldn't say Valo is giving the finger to his heartgram/chain-wearing fans either. It stands very much on it's own as a smart piece of electronic musicianship, featuring very talented remixers and producers.

My RANKING: It doesn't work as a remix album for a rock band, but it's worth a listen for fans of sample-based electronic music and really heavy electro. Give it a shot and let me know what you think.